We've resorted to running through a test sequence manually, logging frametimes using OCAT and then using that data to generate our charts. Unfortunately, there's no built-in benchmark in Back 4 Blood - see our guide for how to make a good built-in benchmark for more on this subject. This appears to be an Nvidia-promoted game, though the inclusion of AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution could mean it's more of an agnostic title that's not specifically promoted by either GPU brand. Nvidia's drivers specifically mention being game ready for Back 4 Blood while AMD's drivers do not - basically the reverse of what we saw with our Far Cry 6 performance testing. We've updated to the latest Nvidia's 496.13 drivers and AMD 21.10.2 drivers. We also used an Asus PN50 Mini-PC with a Ryzen 7 4800U chip to test AMD's integrated graphics performance. Besides the above, we also checked out performance on a laptop with a Core i7-1065G7 and a different laptop with a Core i7-1165G7 - those are Intel's fastest Ice Lake and Tiger Lake mobile GPUs, respectively. We've tested Back 4 Blood using our standard graphics test PC, equipped with a Core i9-9900K CPU, to see how the various GPUs actually stack up. We'll have more detail on the settings near the end of this article. ![]() Let's also note that while there's no mention of VRAM, based on our testing you only need a 4GB card to attempt running at 4K epic settings, and 2GB was more than enough for 1080p epic settings. There's no mention of what you might need for 30 fps at low settings, maybe only at 720p, but we'll cover that as well. And finally, for 4K 60 fps at epic quality, with DLSS or FSR, you'll supposedly need an RTX 2080 Ti or RX 6800. 1440p at epic quality recommends an RTX 2070 or Radeon VII, and we get our first mention of DLSS and FSR as being necessary (they're not). 1080p high at 60 fps recommends a GTX 970 or RX 590 - again, that's a rather lopsided comparison. The RX 570 oddly falls in that same category, even though it's noticeably faster. But this is basically Left 4 Dead 3, mostly created by the same people as the first two games, just without Valve's involvement - a good thing since L4D3 likely won't ever see the light of day, given Gabe's apparent aversion to the number three.īack to the official recommendations, even a lowly GTX 1050 Ti will supposedly manage 60 fps at 1080p and low settings. You won't find fancy schmancy ray tracing effects here, though the game does look pretty good. The Back 4 Blood system requirements look quite tame, and there's a good reason for it. Our testing ranges from the top options in our GPU benchmarks hierarchy, down to rather old cards like the GTX 1050, and we've even included some Intel and AMD integrated graphics options. ![]() Which is good, since the best graphics cards still cost an arm and a leg. Spoiler: It broke 60 fps on just about everything, provided you use the appropriate settings. You can also set the custom range using the fields in the upper right corner of the chart or using the timeline below.įor convenience, positive gains and negative gains are colored differently in the monthly breakdown table.Back 4 Blood arrived just in time for your Halloween zombie-filled party, and we've tested it out on a bunch of graphics cards to see how well it runs. If there's enough data, you can change the zoom of the chart to: 24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, 3 monthes, 6 monthes, 1 year, 3 year and the entire period. Hourly data is only available for the last 7 days. Steam charts show the number of players for each day / hour. Each game page contains a Steam chart and monthly breakdown. SteamPlayerCount is a free source that allows you to look up different games and see how many people are playing them at a time. ![]() ![]() The Walking Dead: The Telltale Definitive Series
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |